|
|
Post by snacky on Nov 12, 2014 20:52:14 GMT
Ooh - yes that bit was kept on the end of the ep I saw. I loved it! Especially William walking away at the end - hahahaha.  |
|
|
|
Post by Fallenbelle on Nov 12, 2014 21:22:32 GMT
Btw, I'd sort of like to see William impressed (and turned on) by some action Julia takes.  That kind of reminds me of the Brackenrieds when Margaret ends up on the right wrong side of the law. (Who Killed the Electric Carriage) That would be good, but anything would be good. I'm also going to at least want a scene like S4's Bloodlust, you know, that isn't a fantasy this time. You know, where Julia says or does something and since no one is in the station, William just takes her there in his office. That would be hot.  |
|
|
|
Post by snacky on Nov 12, 2014 21:37:52 GMT
That kind of reminds me of the Brackenrieds when Margaret ends up on the right wrong side of the law. (Who Killed the Electric Carriage) That would be good, but anything would be good. I'm also going to at least want a scene like S4's Bloodlust, you know, that isn't a fantasy this time. You know, where Julia says or does something and since no one is in the station, William just takes her there in his office. That would be hot. Aaaah, I see what you're getting at. MM showed us what they can get away with in Bloodlust, so show us the goods now please. What might be the circumstances? I'd think some sort of ongoing sexual frustration would have to build up first. That would mean disrupting the "happy time" that's going on now. Maybe that's another card the writers are keeping in their pocket for now.  Or perhaps that's the scene next time Julia gets out of jail. Or perhaps Julia is getting a little frustrated with William keeping his tie on in the downstairs room and decides to show him how to expand their repertoire. Or perhaps William catches Julia reading Dracula and hijinks ensue. |
|
|
|
Post by Fallenbelle on Nov 12, 2014 21:44:52 GMT
That would be good, but anything would be good. I'm also going to at least want a scene like S4's Bloodlust, you know, that isn't a fantasy this time. You know, where Julia says or does something and since no one is in the station, William just takes her there in his office. That would be hot. Aaaah, I see what you're getting at. MM showed us what they can get away with in Bloodlust, so show us the goods now please. What might be the circumstances? I'd think some sort of ongoing sexual frustration would have to build up first. That would mean disrupting the "happy time" that's going on now. Maybe that's another card the writers are keeping in their pocket for now. Or perhaps that's the scene next time Julia gets out of jail. Or perhaps Julia is getting a little frustrated with William keeping his tie on in the downstairs room and decides to show him how to expand their repertoire. Or perhaps William catches Julia reading Dracula and hijinks ensue. It doesn't have to be separation-they are still in their honeymoon phase, and as I recall, you don't really need much of a reason in that phase. Or, if you prefer it after angst, you could have it be makeup sex after Julia gets out of jail and William is upset with her for continuing to get herself into trouble. Or, William is putting late hours on a case, and Julia goes to see him. Or, Julia gets George to announce to William that there's someone to see him in the interview room, and then quickly leaves, because George is both a gentleman and a bro. The possibilities are quite endless. |
|
|
|
Post by snacky on Nov 12, 2014 22:00:42 GMT
It doesn't have to be separation-they are still in their honeymoon phase, and as I recall, you don't really need much of a reason in that phase. Or, if you prefer it after angst, you could have it be makeup sex after Julia gets out of jail and William is upset with her for continuing to get herself into trouble. Or, William is putting late hours on a case, and Julia goes to see him. Or, Julia gets George to announce to William that there's someone to see him in the interview room, and then quickly leaves, because George is both a gentleman and a bro. The possibilities are quite endless. Well, I guess we just have to hold out and see whether the writers pitch us softballs or hardballs! |
|
|
|
Post by Murdork on Nov 13, 2014 0:01:01 GMT
Hello everyone,
I have looked all over this website and thread but perhaps I have missed it. Could you please tell me where I can find a link to, or more information on, the interview with Peter Mitchell where he talks about a miscarriage? Was it recent and was he referring specifically to Julia or was that an inference? Thank you so much.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fallenbelle on Nov 13, 2014 0:11:57 GMT
Hello everyone, I have looked all over this website and thread but perhaps I have missed it. Could you please tell me where I can find a link to, or more information on, the interview with Peter Mitchell where he talks about a miscarriage? Was it recent and was he referring specifically to Julia or was that an inference? Thank you so much. It's from a podcast. Here's the link, or you can also find it in iTunes. www.wgc.ca/files/WTTV024_MurdochMysteries_Mitchell_15Oct13.mp3he really just tosses the idea out there rather than discuss it. He also says that William had sex with Anna Fulford as well. I'd love to hear more of this stuff with other writers -really good insight. |
|
|
|
Post by Murdork on Nov 13, 2014 0:14:49 GMT
Thanks so much I am listening now.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrsbrisby on Nov 13, 2014 4:12:57 GMT
Reruns of Numbers have been coming on here, and I think that show is probably the closest equivalent to what should have had an MM audience in the US market: it had cops but not a lot of gore because it was more "family" aimed. But it also had math geekery. It didn't have the period "universe" or the style chops of Murdoch Mysteries, though, so it couldn't be called a cult show. The audience was probably mostly "family". I think during it's third season they tried to throw some characters - discretely - in bed, lol. Not enough to save it from being cancelled. IMHO, the geek romance wasn't compelling enough. Yes we have very weird notions of what is appropriate and what is not appropriate for children to watch. Years ago we saw the movie "Time Cop." We were sitting behind a couple and their three were young, between maybe 12 to 6 years old. There was a short scene of a naked woman from the waist up as far as I remember and the parents immediately distracted the children and covered their eyes until the next scene. Not once did they shield the children from the violent scenes. Go figure. scene of a naked woman |
|
|
|
Post by Hodge on Nov 13, 2014 4:17:37 GMT
Yes we have very weird notions of what is appropriate and what is not appropriate for children to watch. Years ago we saw the movie "Time Cop." We were sitting behind a couple and their three were young, between maybe 12 to 6 years old. There was a short scene of a naked woman from the waist up as far as I remember and the parents immediately distracted the children and covered their eyes until the next scene. Not once did they shield the children from the violent scenes. Go figure. I've always thought it strange that Americans will allow their kids to watch any amount of violence on TV and in movies but someone making love is considered inappropriate. Surely it should be the other way around.  |
|
|
|
Post by CosmicCavalcade on Nov 13, 2014 4:21:17 GMT
Yes we have very weird notions of what is appropriate and what is not appropriate for children to watch. Years ago we saw the movie "Time Cop." We were sitting behind a couple and their three were young, between maybe 12 to 6 years old. There was a short scene of a naked woman from the waist up as far as I remember and the parents immediately distracted the children and covered their eyes until the next scene. Not once did they shield the children from the violent scenes. Go figure. I've always thought it strange that Americans will allow their kids to watch any amount of violence on TV and in movies but someone making love is considered inappropriate. Surely it should be the other way around. Not when your economy runs off of continuous war... |
|
|
|
Post by mrsbrisby on Nov 13, 2014 4:30:23 GMT
Yes we have very weird notions of what is appropriate and what is not appropriate for children to watch. Years ago we saw the movie "Time Cop." We were sitting behind a couple and their three were young, between maybe 12 to 6 years old. There was a short scene of a naked woman from the waist up as far as I remember and the parents immediately distracted the children and covered their eyes until the next scene. Not once did they shield the children from the violent scenes. Go figure. I've always thought it strange that Americans will allow their kids to watch any amount of violence on TV and in movies but someone making love is considered inappropriate. Surely it should be the other way around. How right you are, my dear. We can think our Puritan heritage for that. The views on sex in America have a very long, complex, and interesting history. The subject is a rich one and can be discussed for years so I will leave it at thist--we are really screwed up. |
|
|
|
Post by mrsbrisby on Nov 13, 2014 4:33:50 GMT
I've always thought it strange that Americans will allow their kids to watch any amount of violence on TV and in movies but someone making love is considered inappropriate. Surely it should be the other way around. Not when your economy runs off of continuous war... I have to agree, CC. If the US were a person I think he or she would have about a million separate personalities. I guess that explains the last election. |
|
|
|
Post by snacky on Nov 13, 2014 4:40:35 GMT
Americans will allow their kids to watch any amount of violence but making love is considered inappropriate. -we are really screwed up. lol so true. But how come Asian guys think we are all party gals from Girls Gone Wild? Skipped that Puritan part of our heritage? |
|
|
|
Post by Fallenbelle on Nov 13, 2014 4:41:10 GMT
I've always thought it strange that Americans will allow their kids to watch any amount of violence on TV and in movies but someone making love is considered inappropriate. Surely it should be the other way around. How right you are, my dear. We can think our Puritan heritage for that. The views on sex in America have a very long, complex, and interesting history. The subject is a rich one and can be discussed for years so I will leave it at thist--we are really screwed up. Indeed. A lot of our idiosyncrasies can be laid at the feet of the Puritans. Britain had Cromwell only for a dozen or so years, but that was the first 150 years of the US. Plus, the country was born via violence, so the values (for better or worse) stuck. |
|
