|
|
Post by lovemondays on Oct 28, 2014 18:00:55 GMT
Lol, that's because they've primed us. We are putty in their hands  . LOL! It's true! I don't think they'd troll so hard as to not marry them at all, but I do suspect that they won't actually give us a wedding-just a fade to black. However, CC speculated on Tumblr that they could just fade out on an image of William's tie on the floor, and that might possibly make up for the lack of a wedding.  For me, at least, anyway.  Ooooh, ahhhhh! That might ALMOST be enough. When do we get to see the risque outfit that Helene tweeted? That had to be a wedding night troll  ! |
|
|
|
Post by Fallenbelle on Oct 28, 2014 18:10:15 GMT
If I didn't think I'd get heaps of hate mail, I'd probably have already written a William/Anna angst tryst from SotWS. It certainly hints that it happened, and if it did, that was certainly the opportunity.  It was and whilst I'd like to believe it did I also want to believe that Willliam is a virgin so I'll go with they had fun but didn't go all the way.  I'm in the same boat as you. However, there is something too irresistibly sweet about him waiting so long.  |
|
|
|
Post by Fallenbelle on Oct 28, 2014 18:12:59 GMT
LOL! It's true! I don't think they'd troll so hard as to not marry them at all, but I do suspect that they won't actually give us a wedding-just a fade to black. However, CC speculated on Tumblr that they could just fade out on an image of William's tie on the floor, and that might possibly make up for the lack of a wedding. For me, at least, anyway. Ooooh, ahhhhh! That might ALMOST be enough. When do we get to see the risque outfit that Helene tweeted? That had to be a wedding night troll ! How sad is it that we now suspect everything to be a troll? How jaded we've become... I wonder if they plan on out-trolling a troll and everything they've posted actually happens.  |
|
|
|
Post by Hodge on Oct 28, 2014 18:52:26 GMT
It was and whilst I'd like to believe it did I also want to believe that Willliam is a virgin so I'll go with they had fun but didn't go all the way. I'm in the same boat as you. However, there is something too irresistibly sweet about him waiting so long. I'm just listening to an interview with Peter Mitchell, he wrote SotWS, and he says William is not a virgin as he would never have turned up 10 mins. late for work if he hadn't slept with Anna. However he also says that the other writers disagree with him. I knew he'd said this before in a video interview but couldn't find it again. Here's the interview it's long, almost and hour and a half but pretty good: www.wgc.ca/files/WTTV024_MurdochMysteries_Mitchell_15Oct13.mp3 |
|
|
|
Post by Fallenbelle on Oct 28, 2014 19:43:01 GMT
I'm in the same boat as you. However, there is something too irresistibly sweet about him waiting so long. I'm just listening to an interview with Peter Mitchell, he wrote SotWS, and he says William is not a virgin as he would never have turned up 10 mins. late for work if he hadn't slept with Anna. However he also says that the other writers disagree with him. I knew he'd said this before in a video interview but couldn't find it again. Here's the interview it's long, almost and hour and a half but pretty good: www.wgc.ca/files/WTTV024_MurdochMysteries_Mitchell_15Oct13.mp3So in other words, we have duality theory. It would explain a lot-such as why there's evidence for both positions. All this means is that you can pick the position you like. Just because I hate the fact of him not having any fun at all, and remaining pure for a woman married to another man; for now, I'm going to go with he's been with others, but never Julia. It's the best of both worlds. Still, the Murdoch Identity was not written by Mitchell, but by Laurie Lynd. So, that's no help either in establishing continuity. |
|
|
|
Post by Hodge on Oct 28, 2014 20:06:26 GMT
I'm just listening to an interview with Peter Mitchell, he wrote SotWS, and he says William is not a virgin as he would never have turned up 10 mins. late for work if he hadn't slept with Anna. However he also says that the other writers disagree with him. I knew he'd said this before in a video interview but couldn't find it again. Here's the interview it's long, almost and hour and a half but pretty good: www.wgc.ca/files/WTTV024_MurdochMysteries_Mitchell_15Oct13.mp3So in other words, we have duality theory. It would explain a lot-such as why there's evidence for both positions. All this means is that you can pink the position you like. Just because I hate the fact of him not having any fun at all, and remaining pure for a woman married to another man; for now, I'm going to go with he's been with others, but never Julia. It's the best of both worlds. Still, the Murdoch Identity was not written by Mitchell, but by Laurie Lynd. So, that's no help either in establishing continuity. Sorry, I don't get what TMI has to do with it...? |
|
|
|
Post by Hodge on Oct 28, 2014 20:08:07 GMT
I'm just listening to an interview with Peter Mitchell, he wrote SotWS, and he says William is not a virgin as he would never have turned up 10 mins. late for work if he hadn't slept with Anna. However he also says that the other writers disagree with him. I knew he'd said this before in a video interview but couldn't find it again. Here's the interview it's long, almost and hour and a half but pretty good: www.wgc.ca/files/WTTV024_MurdochMysteries_Mitchell_15Oct13.mp3So in other words, we have duality theory. It would explain a lot-such as why there's evidence for both positions. All this means is that you can pink the position you like. Just because I hate the fact of him not having any fun at all, and remaining pure for a woman married to another man; for now, I'm going to go with he's been with others, but never Julia. It's the best of both worlds. Still, the Murdoch Identity was not written by Mitchell, but by Laurie Lynd. So, that's no help either in establishing continuity. We could also go with the most votes wins and as PM is the only one that thinks he's not and the rest of the writers think he is then the virgin theory holds. |
|
|
|
Post by lovemondays on Oct 28, 2014 21:01:04 GMT
I'm just listening to an interview with Peter Mitchell, he wrote SotWS, and he says William is not a virgin as he would never have turned up 10 mins. late for work if he hadn't slept with Anna. However he also says that the other writers disagree with him. I knew he'd said this before in a video interview but couldn't find it again. Here's the interview it's long, almost and hour and a half but pretty good: www.wgc.ca/files/WTTV024_MurdochMysteries_Mitchell_15Oct13.mp3So in other words, we have duality theory. It would explain a lot-such as why there's evidence for both positions. All this means is that you can pink the position you like. Just because I hate the fact of him not having any fun at all, and remaining pure for a woman married to another man; for now, I'm going to go with he's been with others, but never Julia. It's the best of both worlds. Still, the Murdoch Identity was not written by Mitchell, but by Laurie Lynd. So, that's no help either in establishing continuity. I like a duality theory. There's less bickering that way . I am still in the 'he's not a virgin' camp. It doesn't actually matter what the MM writers think. Maureen Jennings herself had him doing the nasty with Enid! He's her character so her vote wins IMHO  . |
|
|
|
Post by Hodge on Oct 28, 2014 21:24:10 GMT
So in other words, we have duality theory. It would explain a lot-such as why there's evidence for both positions. All this means is that you can pink the position you like. Just because I hate the fact of him not having any fun at all, and remaining pure for a woman married to another man; for now, I'm going to go with he's been with others, but never Julia. It's the best of both worlds. Still, the Murdoch Identity was not written by Mitchell, but by Laurie Lynd. So, that's no help either in establishing continuity. I like a duality theory. There's less bickering that way . I am still in the 'he's not a virgin' camp. It doesn't actually matter what the MM writers think. Maureen Jennings herself had him doing the nasty with Enid! He's her character so her vote wins IMHO . The books are a different universe IMO so yes, we can have duality, he is in the show and he isn't in the books. I never liked the fact he did it with Enid however Julia was a totally different character and that wouldn't have worked. I did like Amy Slade though and I think combining the two characters of JO and AS into one for the show worked really well. However he hasn't been with Julia in the show despite half of her is AS! |
|
|
|
Post by carco on Oct 28, 2014 21:47:31 GMT
I'm just listening to an interview with Peter Mitchell, he wrote SotWS, and he says William is not a virgin as he would never have turned up 10 mins. late for work if he hadn't slept with Anna. However he also says that the other writers disagree with him. I knew he'd said this before in a video interview but couldn't find it again. Here's the interview it's long, almost and hour and a half but pretty good: www.wgc.ca/files/WTTV024_MurdochMysteries_Mitchell_15Oct13.mp3So in other words, we have duality theory. It would explain a lot-such as why there's evidence for both positions. All this means is that you can pink the position you like. Just because I hate the fact of him not having any fun at all, and remaining pure for a woman married to another man; for now, I'm going to go with he's been with others, but never Julia. It's the best of both worlds. Still, the Murdoch Identity was not written by Mitchell, but by Laurie Lynd. So, that's no help either in establishing continuity. I haven't heard the interview yet but thanks for the link talbotrail. The idea that Peter Mitchell has one opinion and other writers have another falls somewhat in line with (really) old interviews I read from the Avengers stars and writers. I mentioned it a little while back on this board but the gist of it was that each held different opinions on whether or not Steed and Mrs. Peel had ever been together...including the actors who played those roles. Meantime nothing was ever seen on screen. Imagination can make things a lot more interesting I think.  |
|
|
|
Post by snacky on Oct 28, 2014 22:03:03 GMT
lol you crack me up so much talbotrail! I just love the fact the writers actually argue over this! I pity Yannick for having the job of presenting a consistent character - his choices override the conflicting material. And I think everyone wants to leave it open to fan interpretation. [This was in response to Talbotrail's remark that the writer's should just vote over whether William is a virgin - my Kindle seems to be eating up the quotes I respond to...] |
|
|
|
Post by snacky on Oct 28, 2014 22:18:32 GMT
It would amuse me to no end if the MM team rose to that super-hip level of fan service. If they didn't someone probably slapped themselves on the forehead after reading CC's post. "Duh." moment. [This was in response to a comment about the honeymoon night being indicated by a tie on the floor - good one CC! - original quote eaten by Kindle] |
|
|
|
Post by Fallenbelle on Oct 29, 2014 0:06:35 GMT
So in other words, we have duality theory. It would explain a lot-such as why there's evidence for both positions. All this means is that you can pink the position you like. Just because I hate the fact of him not having any fun at all, and remaining pure for a woman married to another man; for now, I'm going to go with he's been with others, but never Julia. It's the best of both worlds. Still, the Murdoch Identity was not written by Mitchell, but by Laurie Lynd. So, that's no help either in establishing continuity. Sorry, I don't get what TMI has to do with it...? William has moves and ease with Anna that he never show elsewhere on the show. No, he doesn't sleep with Anna on the show, but it hints at there being a man with some experience with women. |
|
|
|
Post by Hodge on Oct 29, 2014 1:04:31 GMT
Sorry, I don't get what TMI has to do with it...? William has moves and ease with Anna that he never show elsewhere on the show. No, he doesn't sleep with Anna on the show, but it hints at there being a man with some experience with women. Ahh, yes he knew what he was doing but he knew what he was doing with Julia too in TGM but we know it didn't go anywhere. |
|
|
|
Post by Hodge on Oct 29, 2014 1:07:52 GMT
So in other words, we have duality theory. It would explain a lot-such as why there's evidence for both positions. All this means is that you can pink the position you like. Just because I hate the fact of him not having any fun at all, and remaining pure for a woman married to another man; for now, I'm going to go with he's been with others, but never Julia. It's the best of both worlds. Still, the Murdoch Identity was not written by Mitchell, but by Laurie Lynd. So, that's no help either in establishing continuity. I haven't heard the interview yet but thanks for the link talbotrail. The idea that Peter Mitchell has one opinion and other writers have another falls somewhat in line with (really) old interviews I read from the Avengers stars and writers. I mentioned it a little while back on this board but the gist of it was that each held different opinions on whether or not Steed and Mrs. Peel had ever been together...including the actors who played those roles. Meantime nothing was ever seen on screen. Imagination can make things a lot more interesting I think. Just because PM meant that to happen doesn't mean it did, it wasn't shown so it's not canon. I choose to believe they only went so far, doesn't mean William wouldn't still be late for work.... |
|
.
For me, at least, anyway. 
!
.
